The inbound marketing era is ending
Free traffic and attention was a generous and fun window of time, but the party is over
Adam Singer has done it again! He’s becoming almost a regular contributor here at The BoldBrush Letter. The following article was written by Adam Singer, the man and the mind behind the publication Hot Takes.
Hot Takes is spicy, useful, occasionally snarky takes (~1-2x/week at most) from Adam Singer on marketing, tech, investing, creativity and more. We, at BoldBrush, have found Adam’s thoughts about marketing insightful, refreshing, contrarian and aligned with our own philosophy of valuing real long-term human relationships over cheap engagement.
We urge you to subscribe to his insight packed newsletter, which has great value for artists and creatives by clicking the button below:
This article originally appeared on the Hot Takes here. I’m sharing it with The BoldBrush Letter because in it, Adam has explored an important topic for creative people.
Editor’s Note: In two days, this post will be locked and is available only to paid members because we don’t want this duplicate content on the open web in a way that might draw traffic away from Adam’s original post. If you are not a BoldBrush paid subscriber, you can still read the entire post here.
Clintavo’s Curated Corner
I found this cool piece in our BoldBrush Exhibit and Competition and noticed the artist has chosen to make prints available.
(Clintavo’s curated corner continues after the article)
The inbound marketing era is ending
“It is not the strongest of the species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the one most responsive to change.” — Charles Darwin
Sadly, as many of you already sense, the inbound marketing era is coming to a close. In the late 2000s I wrote several posts on this concept, before HubSpot made it popular and when most companies weren’t doing much here (I used to call it ‘pull marketing,’ but it means the same thing). I wrote one very popular post on how search and social worked together with a simple graphic illustrating the concept that was viewed by a few million people, as at the time it was still a somewhat novel idea. I probably should have built a company around it, but instead I just applied it to my clients, and a bit later went to work at Google.
Anyway, inbound didn’t collapse overnight, it simply turned back into what these types of channels (channels owned by large companies) were in a pre-internet world: a rented audience, delivering ideas at the whim of gatekeepers. It is us, the frog, that has been boiled: with organic traffic and attention drying up, our work used to train AI, our ideas copied and borrowed without links or attribution. The deal has been altered, and not in your favor.
For years, marketers and online creators figured out that if you wrote well enough, optimized cleverly enough, or simply built sufficient content and backlinks, the internet would indeed reward you. Build a blog, build an audience, and search engines would send you the world’s attention on tap. Post something clever on social, and your followers would see it. An unknown artist could share their songs or mixes on Napster and people would actually find them (modern streaming platforms will never recommend them). We thought it would be like this forever, but it was too good to be true. Gatekeepers find a way.
Today, search engines look less like a digital Library of Alexandria and more like private equity inspired toll roads. Organic search is no longer a flowing river of non-paid traffic via 10 blue links, but an cacophony of paid placements, featured snippets, AI summaries, and a dozen other diversions, as search engines run millions of tests to try to find their place in the new world. Even if you rank, you often get the scraps after the engines answer the query themselves or simply point to their own ads. Your future search traffic will be mostly branded queries of people who go to an engine to find you because they already knew you existed, using the engines for navigation.
Social media proved to be even worse. Follower counts might as well not even be real when all they provide is potential reach (if algos decide to show your work). Your community and distribution are now fully mediated by algorithms that serve their own interests and the banality of the crowd. A post can vanish in the churn, no matter how engaged your “audience” claims to be. Ethan Strauss talked about this in his story “this post will not go viral,” and incidentally, I had a hard time even finding it in search. Big tech declared war on hyperlinks and is winning. Incidentally altering the deal to the point we stop doing simple things like share our hyperlinks could ultimately be their undoing, as people decide it’s a bad deal. They could choose to reverse course, of course.
PR and traditional media relations are changing too, my friend Lulu going as far as declaring them dead. Even in the best days, most outlets weren’t in the business of marketing you, they were telling stories that served their own editorial or commercial aims. With constrained newsrooms and shrinking resources, coverage that once came easily or at least occasionally now rarely comes at all. And even if you did land a mention, publications are reluctant to link back, guarding their own brand equity and ad impressions (trad media has always been pretty hostile to the internet). The halo of ‘earned media’ has mostly evaporated, reminding everyone this is attention borrowed, not owned.
The early, generous web, where bloggers and forums linked out freely, and sharing felt cultural rather than transactional, has been thinning for years. Many have abandoned publishing on their own sites and are content to be digital sharecroppers, posting directly to social platforms and letting the value of their words, images, and ideas accrue to the megacorps that run them. The open ecosystem of personal blogs and independent voices has thinned, replaced by streams optimized for engagement metrics that someone else controls. For the purposes of inbound marketing, this leaves continually less referral traffic.
Which leaves email. It lacks the glamour of a viral tweet or a top-ranked search result. But it is one of the last direct, permission-based connections you do, in fact, own. A person gives you their email address and you can reach them, no algorithm in between. Inbox placement is vastly superior and more stable than the roulette of modern discovery platforms. This is a form of push communication, of course, which is the antithesis of inbound marketing — you have to show up, traffic and attention don’t just come to you for work in the past. This is actually a return to form of how marketing used to be. Inbound marketing existing at all is a bit of an aberration, now we’re back to making ads and sending things.
Search, social, PR, etc., can feel important, even indispensable. But the actual percentage of your audience you can reach through them is ever-diminishing, and returning to their natural state: places you need to pay for attention. If they still work for you today, great, they do for everyone a bit too. But you should be actively working to hedge against the changing tides of the internet. You have to work with the assumption whatever alpha remains is going to be clawed back, because chances are, that’s what will happen.
Of course, word of mouth will still exist (and I think will be more important than ever, as it permeates all the gatekeeping of algos since people will text directly and talk in person with friends about products, brands and artists they love). But that’s not really inbound marketing, that’s a natural outcome of having a product or ideas worth sharing. You only earn word of mouth from delivering a great experience.
The collapse of inbound channels was inevitable, as middlemen always consolidate power. The direct line is all that survives. If you want to own an audience today, you have to earn and keep a place in their inbox and build a highly engaged list. The good news is the best marketers, artists and creators have known how to do this for years.
PS — Editor’s Note: Please support artists and help us get more exposure for the artists featured in this newsletter by clicking the “Like” icon ❤️, by clicking the “Restack” icon 🔁, or by leaving a comment. The more engagement we get, the more widely these images get shown. Help us support human artists and push back against the encroachment of AI!
PPS - If you enjoyed today’s article, don’t forget to subscribe directly to Adam Singer’s Hot Takes.
FASO Loves Martha Brane’s paintings
Wouldn’t You Love to work with a website hosting company that actually promotes their artists?
As you can see, at FASO, we actually do, and,
we are the only website host we know of that does.
Click the button below to start working
with an art website host that actually cares about art.
Clintavo’s Curated Corner
We’re Looking for Great Art!
If you know of a great piece of real visual art (no AI art) that we should consider for future illustration of our articles or to feature in Clintavo’s Curated Corner, please click the button below and leave a sentence or two explaining what you like about a piece with a link to it on the web. It may be your own art or someone else’s (please do not send via email as we are much less likely to see or respond to those, thank you):
PS - Wouldn’t You Love to work with a website hosting company that actually promotes their artists?
Click the button below to start working with an art website host that actually cares about art.
I feel like this has been building for a few years now. I personally have seen my sales from social media posts and even direct from my website dwindle while my sales from art shows and newsletter subscribers have increased. Lots of things factor into that, but my sense is a that what you describe is the biggest contributor
Informative article. Thank you.